A computer science technology news blog based on Google, Microsoft, Apple, Android, iPhone, brings you a wide coverage of Internet media news, gadgets reviews and tips and tricks that you would not find anywhere else. Learn how to tweak Firefox, Facebook tricks, unlock iPhone, iPad and root Android phones.
Friday, 29 July 2011
Google Plus vs Facebook
After rocketing to 10 million users in its first three weeks, Google's social-networking site appears to be getting less attention. The time spent on Google+ has also fallen well below time spent on Facebook. A consultant called Google+ just "another way for Google to gain market share."
Less Engagement Than Facebook
According to a Hitwise blog post by Heather Dougherty, as of July 19 the average visit time for Google+ was five minutes and 50 seconds, up from four minutes and 52 seconds the week before. But she noted that's a far cry from the average time users spend on Facebook, which was 21 minutes and 57 seconds the same week.
For the week ending July 23, Google+ received 1.79 million visits, down 3 percent from the previous week, and the average time spent on the site fell 10 percent to 5 minutes and 15 seconds, Hitwise said Wednesday.
Less Engagement Than Facebook
According to a Hitwise blog post by Heather Dougherty, as of July 19 the average visit time for Google+ was five minutes and 50 seconds, up from four minutes and 52 seconds the week before. But she noted that's a far cry from the average time users spend on Facebook, which was 21 minutes and 57 seconds the same week.
For the week ending July 23, Google+ received 1.79 million visits, down 3 percent from the previous week, and the average time spent on the site fell 10 percent to 5 minutes and 15 seconds, Hitwise said Wednesday.
By contrast, visits for the week ending July 16 shot up 283 percent from the week before, and 821 percent from the week before that, Hitwise said last week.
As of July 16, Google+ ranked as the 42nd-most-visited social networking site and the 638th-most-visited site overall in the U.S., Hitwise said last week. Hitwise didn't update those rankings Wednesday, but given the drop in usage it's unlikely that Google+ improved its position on either list.
Microsoft Mistake or Microsoft Social Networking 'Accident'
Microsoft Social Networking 'Accident'
On http://www.socl.com/ shows this writing on main page
Thanks for stopping by.
Socl.com is an internal design project from a team in Microsoft Research which was mistakenly published to the web.
We didn’t mean to, honest.
Happy Birthday, MS-DOS -- 30 candles 27 July 1981- 27 July 2011
Happy Birthday, MS-DOS -- 30 candles ( 27 July 1981- 27 July 2011)
MS-DOS ( short for Microsoft Disk Operating System) is anoperating system for x86-based personal computers. It was the most commonly used member of the DOS family of operating systems, and was the main operating system for IBM PC compatible personal computers during the 1980s to the mid 1990s, until it was gradually superseded by operating systems offering a graphical user interface (GUI), in particular by various generations of the Microsoft Windows operating system.
MS-DOS ( short for Microsoft Disk Operating System) is anoperating system for x86-based personal computers. It was the most commonly used member of the DOS family of operating systems, and was the main operating system for IBM PC compatible personal computers during the 1980s to the mid 1990s, until it was gradually superseded by operating systems offering a graphical user interface (GUI), in particular by various generations of the Microsoft Windows operating system.
The following versions of MS-DOS were released to the public.
- MS-DOS 1.x
- Version 1.12 (OEM) - Compaq release of PC-DOS 1.10
- Version 1.19 (OEM)[7] - Zenith OEM
- Version 1.25 (OEM) - Microsoft repackaging of PC-DOS 1.10
- MS-DOS 2.x - Support for 10 MB hard disk drives and tree-structure filing system
- Version 2.0 (OEM)
- Version 2.1 (OEM)
- Version 2.11 (OEM)
- Version 2.2 (OEM)
- Version 2.21 (OEM)
- MS-DOS 3.x
- Version 3.0 (OEM) - Support for larger hard disk drives
- Version 3.1 (OEM) - Support for Microsoft Networks
- Version 3.2 (OEM)
- Version 3.21 (OEM)
- Version 3.25 (OEM)
- Version 3.3 (OEM)
- Version 3.3a (OEM)
- Version 3.3r (OEM)
- Version 3.31 (OEM) - Compaq 3.31 supports FAT16 and larger drives.
- Version 3.35 (OEM)
- MS-DOS 4.x - includes a graphical/mouse interface.
- Version 4.00 (OEM)
- Version 4.01 (OEM) - IBM patched Version 4.00 before Microsoft released it.
- Version 4.01a (OEM)
- MS-DOS 5.x
- Version 5.0 (Retail) - includes a full-screen editor. A number of bugs required reissue.
- Version 5.0a (Retail) - With this release, IBM and Microsoft versions diverge.
- Version 5.0.500 (WinNT) - All Windows NT 32-bit versions ship with files from DOS 5.0
- MS-DOS 6.x
- Version 6.0 (Retail) - Online help through QBASIC. Disk compression and antivirus included.
- Version 6.2 (Retail) - Microsoft and IBM alternate versions, IBM has 6.1, 6.3
- Version 6.21 (Retail) - Stacker-infringing DBLSPACE removed.
- Version 6.22 (Retail) - New DRVSPACE compression.
- MS-DOS 7.x
- Version 7.0 (Win95,95A) - Support for long file names. New editor.
- Version 7.1 (Win95B-Win98SE) - Support for FAT32 file system
- MS-DOS 8.0
- Version 8.0 (WinME) - Integrated drivers for faster Windows loading.
- Version 8.0 (WinXP) - DOS boot disks created by XP and later contain files from WinME. The internal DOS is still 5.0
Microsoft DOS was released through the OEM channel, until DRI released DR-DOS 5.0 as a retail upgrade. With PC-DOS 5.00.1, the IBM-Microsoft agreement started to end, and IBM entered the retail DOS market with IBMDOS 5.00.1, 5.02, 6.00 and PC-DOS 6.10, 6.30, 7.00 and 2000.
A number of beta versions have surfaced on the Internet, such as 5.0 (a ten-diskette version in the same vein as 4.0), 7.00 beta 1 (based on 6.00), 7.00 beta 2 (based on 6.22). An OEM source package for 6.00, and a late release of 6.2(b) have also been seen. These are not retail versions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)